This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] AMD bdver2 processors 2/2 - TBM


On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:00 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Quentin Neill
> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:03 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:56 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Quentin Neill
>>>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> These two patches add support for BMI and TBM ISAs to be introduced in
>>>>> AMD bdver2 processors.
>>>>>
>>>>> The full encoding specification is delayed, however I have posted
>>>>> abbreviated specs on the gcc mailing list:
>>>>> BMI: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01766.html
>>>>> TBM: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01767.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on x86-64 with "make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=i386.exp".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why is "bextr" in both BMI and TBM? ?Please double check you don't have
>>>> instructions in both BMI and TBM.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I see. The TBM one takes an immediate operand.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> H.J.
>>
>> Refreshed with updated Changelogs.
>>
>> Tested on x86-64 with "make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=i386.exp".
>>
>> Okay to commit?
>
> Didn't you submit a patch with both BMI and TBM?
>
> --
> H.J.

You are right, Grrrr.
I attached the wrong patch file.
I'll refresh the both patches after addressing objdump feedback you gave.
-- 
Quentin.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]