This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
> I had already asked this question once without getting an answer, but
> think it should have an answer before this change can go in
Sorry I think I missed your question earlier.
> Is AMD indeed
> planning on implementing FMA in a way Intel planned to originally, but
> changed from since?
Yes. AMD is implementing FMA4 with the same way/opcode map as Intel
> If so, what are the plans between the two
> implementations to avoid future collision in the opcode space?
AMD' implementation of FMA4 has been coordinated with Intel to avoid any
collision for this opcode space.