This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] x86: make swapped operand warning be meaningful under Intel syntax
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich at novell dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:56:49 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make swapped operand warning be meaningful under Intel syntax
- References: <49E5E25B.76EA.0078.0@novell.com>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> With how things currently are, the warning message suggests that the
> assembler is going to use impossible operand combinations.
>
> gas/
> 2009-04-15 ?Jan Beulich ?<jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?* config/tc-i386.c (process_operands): Print operands in
> ? ? ? ?correct order depending on intel_syntax.
>
> gas/testsuite/
> 2009-04-15 ?Jan Beulich ?<jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/intel.e: Adjust expectations.
>
OK. Thanks.
--
H.J.