This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
[patch] Fix other cases of C++ no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created (PR 6893)
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Brad Settlemyer <bradles at clemson dot edu>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:02:57 +0100
- Subject: [patch] Fix other cases of C++ no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created (PR 6893)
Hi,
my former mail http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00124.html fixed:
/usr/bin/ld: error in /home/aph/llvm/Release/lib/LLVMInterpreter.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
It had AFAIK no regressions but still in some cases the problem remained the
same, at least when discarded FDE of .eh_frame was referencing (non-discarded)
.gcc_except_table (through LSDA) as the new sanity check failed then.
Regression tested on 86 arch targets, asking for a commit approval incl. the
comment validity review. Bugreported by Brad Settlemyer.
Thanks,
Jan
bfd/
2009-01-30 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* elf-eh-frame.c (REQUIRE_CLEARED_RELOCS) Remove.
(_bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame): Do not check relocations for removed FDEs.
ld/testsuite/
2009-01-30 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* ld-elf/eh-group2.s: New `.cfi_lsda' referencing `.gcc_except_table'.
* ld-elf/eh-group.exp: New test and conditional defininiton of `ELF64'.
--- bfd/elf-eh-frame.c 17 Sep 2008 07:50:28 -0000 1.73
+++ bfd/elf-eh-frame.c 30 Jan 2009 21:44:01 -0000
@@ -549,16 +549,6 @@ _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame (bfd *abfd, stru
< (bfd_size_type) ((buf) - ehbuf))) \
cookie->rel++
-#define REQUIRE_CLEARED_RELOCS(buf) \
- while (cookie->rel < cookie->relend \
- && (cookie->rel->r_offset \
- < (bfd_size_type) ((buf) - ehbuf))) \
- { \
- REQUIRE (cookie->rel->r_info == 0); \
- REQUIRE (cookie->rel->r_addend == 0); \
- cookie->rel++; \
- }
-
#define GET_RELOC(buf) \
((cookie->rel < cookie->relend \
&& (cookie->rel->r_offset \
@@ -817,16 +807,16 @@ _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame (bfd *abfd, stru
buf = last_fde + 4 + hdr_length;
- /* Cleared FDE? The instructions will not be cleared but verify all
- the relocation entries for them are cleared. */
- if (rsec == NULL)
- {
- REQUIRE_CLEARED_RELOCS (buf);
- }
- else
- {
- SKIP_RELOCS (buf);
- }
+ /* For NULL RSEC (cleared FDE belonging to a discarded section)
+ the relocations are commonly cleared. We do not sanity check if
+ all these relocations are cleared as (1) relocations to
+ .gcc_except_table will remain uncleared (they will get dropped
+ with the drop of this unused FDE) and (2) BFD already safely drops
+ relocations of any type in .eh_frame by
+ elf_section_ignore_discarded_relocs.
+ TODO: The .gcc_except_table entries should be also filtered as
+ .eh_frame entries; or GCC could rather use COMDAT for them. */
+ SKIP_RELOCS (buf);
}
/* Try to interpret the CFA instructions and find the first
--- ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group.exp 25 Sep 2008 03:16:42 -0000 1.3
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group.exp 30 Jan 2009 21:44:01 -0000
@@ -40,12 +40,28 @@ if ![is_elf_format] {
return
}
-set build_tests_ld {
- {"Build eh-group1.o"
- "-r" ""
- {eh-group1.s eh-group2.s} {} "eh-group.o"}
+# alpha-linux-gnu does not support 64-bit relocations:
+# relocation truncated to fit: REFLONG against `.gcc_except_table'
+# arm-eabi does not support 64-bit relocations:
+# bad relocation fixup type (1)
+set testname "Guess the target size from eh-group1size.o"
+if [ld_assemble $as "$srcdir/$subdir/eh-group1.s" "tmpdir/eh-group1size.o"] {
+ pass $testname
+} else {
+ fail $testname
}
+set as_options ""
+if [is_elf64 "tmpdir/eh-group1size.o"] {
+ set as_options "$as_options --defsym ELF64=1"
+}
+
+set build_tests_ld [list \
+ [list "Build eh-group1.o" \
+ "-r" "$as_options" \
+ {eh-group1.s eh-group2.s} {} "eh-group.o"] \
+]
+
run_ld_link_tests $build_tests_ld
set testname "Link eh-group.o to eh-group"
--- ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group2.s 20 Sep 2008 08:42:53 -0000 1.2
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group2.s 30 Jan 2009 21:44:01 -0000
@@ -1,4 +1,15 @@
.section sect, "axG", %progbits, sectgroup, comdat
.cfi_startproc
+# Test intention is that LSDA must be provided by the discarded FDE.
+# DW_EH_PE_udata8 = 4
+# DW_EH_PE_udata4 = 3
+ .ifdef ELF64
+ .cfi_lsda 4, lsda
+ .else
+ .cfi_lsda 3, lsda
+ .endif
.skip 16
.cfi_endproc
+
+ .section .gcc_except_table, "a", %progbits
+lsda: