Re: mips-elf regressions

[Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>]

On Oct 8, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Alan Modra wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:50:55AM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > > (Locals must be before Weaks and Weaks must be before Globals
> > > according to gabi).
>
> Not quite.  Locals before others, weaks and globals are not ordered.

Right, I read too quickly.

> > As SGI_COMPAT is true, this looks to be expected.
> >
> > Can someone confirm this ?
>
> Yes.  Although I don't really see a need to break the ELF standard
> when there are no global section symbols.

Aren't section symbols always local ?  If so we could also classify  
symbols
into section symbols, local and non-local (thought for a future  
improvement).

> > If so, shouldn't we update the status of the failing tests (either
> > disabling them on mips-elf or marking
> > them as xfail) ?
>
> xfail.

Ok.  Thank you for your quick reply.

Tristan.