This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: RFH/RFC: symbol index overflow in MIPS linker stubs...
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:27:59PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > I would favour a two instruction sequence, applications will continue to
> > grow. There might be some compatibility traps, but at a superficial
> > glance I haven't found an obvious blocker.
> If we can change the stub sequence without ABI problems, why waste an
> instruction? Support both.
Will the stub section support varying entry sizes? I'm not sure.