This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some othertargets)

From: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:10:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some othertargets)
References: <87vf2b8qf5.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix><20050812133343.GF6906@bubble.grove.modra.org><873bpf6x6e.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix><20050815161535.GK6906@bubble.grove.modra.org>

On 15 Aug 2005, Alan Modra spake:
> Trying again, this time without the ld testsuite changes, since
> sources.redhat.com complained that my message exceeded a 40000 line
> limit.

Odd. Gnus says it was 13702 lines long... still a >500K patch,
though. Maybe its real limit is 512K or something?

>        I guess no one wants to look at such a diff anyway.  :)

I looked in some horror at the volume of changes you'd had to make.
I had no idea I was lumbering you with a monster of this magnitude!

-- 
`I work in computers so, of course, I'm an expert on everything.'
                                                     --- Simon Rumble

References:
- Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some othertargets)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some other targets)
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some othertargets)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some other targets)
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]