This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.18 is rleased
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: Olaf Hering <olh at suse dot de>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:39:13 +0100
- Subject: Re: The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.18 is rleased
- References: <20030124104903.A26314@lucon.org> <u8fzrgi50p.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20030126103424.GA24408@suse.de> <20030201113111.A5689@suse.de> <20030203133508.A15404@lucon.org>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:35:08PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 11:31:11AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 26, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > HJ,
> > > >
> > > > make check fails on powerpc-linux with:
> > > > Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.13.90.0.18/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/elfweak.exp ...
> > > > FAIL: ELF DSO weak data first
> > > > FAIL: ELF DSO weak data last
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Update glibc or try 8.1 based tree?
> >
>
> See
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-09/msg00137.html
>
> When glibc finally treats weak == non-weak, we have to modify bfd for
> that.
glibc treats weak and non-weak equally when doing lookup
(unless LD_DYNAMIC_WEAK is used), since 2002-12-19 in NPTL ld.so builds
and since 2003-01-07 for all the rest.
Jakub