This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: RFC & patch: Rework MIPS command-line handling
> Ugh. Ok, I'll keep _R3000 & _R4000 as they are now, and add the
> _MIPS_ARCH and _MIPS_TUNE that Chris suggested.
> Question: if gcc treats two processors as the same for scheduling,
> should they have the same _MIPS_ARCH and _MIPS_TUNE value? Like,
> should -march=r2000 and -march=r3000 set _MIPS_ARCH to the same
> value (_MIPS_R3000?) to reflect what GCC's doing, or should there
> be separate _MIPS_R2000 and _MIPS_R3000 defines? How about
> -mtune= and _MIPS_TUNE?
Not the same _MIPS_ARCH for sure, the same _MIPS_TUNE possibly. There
are arguments either way :)
Probably should separate them out so we make changes as little as
I will not grease the monkey bars