This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:19:35 -0800
- Subject: Re: [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- References: <m3g03lfd1g.fsf@myware.mynet><20020228165851.A26168@lucon.org>
- Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:58:52 -0800, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said:
HJ> I am not sure if .init_array/.fini_array are supported. It will
HJ> be nice to add them to binutils.
>From my point of view, it's more worthwhile to spend time on getting
.init_array/.fini_array supported than trying to fix up .init/.fini.
I'm willing to help with such an effort, but I probably would need a
fair amount of help (or at least support) from the glibc and binutils
maintainers. Anyone else willing to help with this?
--david