This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
- Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>,GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:33:11 -0800
- Subject: Re: [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- References: <m3g03lfd1g.fsf@myware.mynet> <20020228165851.A26168@lucon.org> <15486.55079.333535.999190@napali.hpl.hp.com>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:19:35PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:58:52 -0800, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said:
>
> HJ> I am not sure if .init_array/.fini_array are supported. It will
> HJ> be nice to add them to binutils.
>
> >From my point of view, it's more worthwhile to spend time on getting
> .init_array/.fini_array supported than trying to fix up .init/.fini.
> I'm willing to help with such an effort, but I probably would need a
> fair amount of help (or at least support) from the glibc and binutils
> maintainers. Anyone else willing to help with this?
>
I believe glibc is ok. The problem is binutils. I didn't see any
supports for DT_INIT_ARRAY, DT_FINI_ARRAY. DT_INIT_ARRAYSZ,
DT_FINI_ARRAYSZ, DT_PREINIT_ARRAY nor DT_PREINIT_ARRAYSZ.
H.J.