This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:52:06 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
On 11 Feb 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Ugh! I always get the dependency between opcodes and bfd wrong :-( I
> had built all-opcodes after installing my patch, but since bfd depends
> on opcodes, and not the other way round as I always think it to be the
> case, I didn't get that far :-(
Everybody preparing and committing patches should "make all-gas
all-binutils all-ld && make -k check" before and after their
changes. Then we'd have less risk of regression creeping in the
way it has (the ld-sh tests). And I probably wouldn't feel a
need to nag about something obvious. ;-) And yes I realize this
might have happened from generic changes and yes the test
failure isn't diagnosed and stuff.
brgds, H-P