This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Subject: Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:20:56 -0800
- Cc: GNU Binutils mailing list <binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Organization: The NUXI BSD group
- References: <20011113135246.A71808@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011113135551.A4053@lucon.org>
- Reply-to: obrien at FreeBSD dot org
[Get raw message]
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:55:51PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:52:46PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > I know this is going to be controveral... But could non libiberty
> > includes be moved from include to bu-include? The reason being is that
> > at the moment it is hard to build a Cygnus-like cross build tree from the
> > Binutils, gdb, and GCC sources. The only conflicting directory is
>
> It is trivial to do. My cross toolchain has binutils, gcc and gdb. I
> only need to type
Specifically how have you set this up?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)