This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
- To: David O'Brien <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
- Subject: Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:55:51 -0800
- Cc: GNU Binutils mailing list <binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- References: <20011113135246.A71808@dragon.nuxi.com>
[Get raw message]
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:52:46PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> I know this is going to be controveral... But could non libiberty
> includes be moved from include to bu-include? The reason being is that
> at the moment it is hard to build a Cygnus-like cross build tree from the
> Binutils, gdb, and GCC sources. The only conflicting directory is
It is trivial to do. My cross toolchain has binutils, gcc and gdb. I
only need to type
# make
to set it up from the binutils, gcc and gdb ssource trees.
H.J.