This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
PATCH: Fix ld-selective/selective.exp
- To: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: PATCH: Fix ld-selective/selective.exp
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:53:27 -0700
- Cc: ljrittle at acm dot org, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
This patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-07/msg00413.html
wouldn't even apply as is. Alan, how did you manage to do that?
Anyway, I checked the following patch to put back `alpha*-* ' removed
by the check in.
H.J.
----
2001-07-27 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
* ld-selective/selective.exp: Fix the error in the last change.
Index: ld-selective/selective.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /work/cvs/gnu/binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.15
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.15 selective.exp
--- ld-selective/selective.exp 2001/07/24 16:21:24 1.1.1.15
+++ ld-selective/selective.exp 2001/07/27 17:44:36
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ set seltests {
{selective1 C 1.c {} {} {dropme1 dropme2} {alpha*-*}}
{selective2 C 2.c {} {} {foo} {alpha*-* mips*-*}}
{selective3 C 2.c {-u foo} {foo} {{foo 0}} {mips*-*}}
- {selective4 C++ 3.cc {} {start a A::foo() B::foo()} {A::bar()} {mips*-*}}
- {selective5 C++ 4.cc {} {start a A::bar()} {A::foo() B::foo()} {mips*-*}}
+ {selective4 C++ 3.cc {} {start a A::foo() B::foo()} {A::bar()} {alpha*-* mips*-*}}
+ {selective5 C++ 4.cc {} {start a A::bar()} {A::foo() B::foo()} {alpha*-* mips*-*}}
{selective6 C++ 5.cc {} {start a A::bar()}
{A::foo() B::foo() dropme1() dropme2()} {*-*-*}}
}