Hello, in Occitan the name of «Thursday» is not written correctly. Indeed, it should be «dijòus» and not «dijóus». It means replacing "dij<U00F3>us" by "dij<U00F2>us". I hope it can be change easily and to backport to glibc 2.31. Sources: https://st.unicode.org/cldr-apps/v#/oc/Gregorian/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_the_days_of_the_week#Romance_languages
Thank you, Quentin. I can see one more misspelled weekday name, according to CLDR: "dimars" -> should be: "dimarç" Also a month name: "abrial" -> should be: "abril" Please confirm or deny.
April has two forms, both are okay. https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/abril#oc Dimarç is wrong, it's even sometimes spelt like in Catalan «dimarts» but the correct Occitan is «dimars», it might have been standardised thus some old dictionaries give a dated spelling. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dimars and https://locongres.org/oc/aplicacions/dicodoc-oc/dicodoc-recerca?option=com_dicodoc&view=search&Itemid=168&type=fr-oc&dic%5B%5D=BASIC&dic%5B%5D=RBVD&dic%5B%5D=ALPC&dic%5B%5D=ATAU&dic%5B%5D=PROV&dic%5B%5D=PNST&dic%5B%5D=OMLH&dic%5B%5D=LAUS&dic%5B%5D=LAGA&dic%5B%5D=LEMO&q=mardi&q2=&submit=Cercar To finish, July has two forms too... julh and julhet It may be a good idea to use «julh» for the short form of the month instead of «jul.» https://locongres.org/oc/aplicacions/dicodoc-oc/dicodoc-recerca?option=com_dicodoc&view=search&Itemid=168&type=fr-oc&dic%5B%5D=BASIC&dic%5B%5D=RBVD&dic%5B%5D=ALPC&dic%5B%5D=ATAU&dic%5B%5D=PROV&dic%5B%5D=PNST&dic%5B%5D=OMLH&dic%5B%5D=LAUS&dic%5B%5D=LAGA&dic%5B%5D=LEMO&q=juillet&q2=&submit=Cercar If you have any more question do not hesitate, I would be glad to answer.
I've posted a patch here: [1] As I said, it is not meant to be complete. I understand there are some obvious typos which must be fixed ASAP. (In reply to Quentin PAGÈS from comment #2) > April has two forms, both are okay. > https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/abril#oc It looks to me like "abril" is preferred while "abrial" being an alternative spelling. What do you think? > Dimarç is wrong, [...] Can you please report it to CLDR? > To finish, July has two forms too... julh and julhet > It may be a good idea to use «julh» for the short form of the month instead > of «jul.» > https://locongres.org/oc/aplicacions/dicodoc-oc/dicodoc- > recerca?option=com_dicodoc&view=search&Itemid=168&type=fr- > oc&dic%5B%5D=BASIC&dic%5B%5D=RBVD&dic%5B%5D=ALPC&dic%5B%5D=ATAU&dic%5B%5D=PRO > V&dic%5B%5D=PNST&dic%5B%5D=OMLH&dic%5B%5D=LAUS&dic%5B%5D=LAGA&dic%5B%5D=LEMO& > q=juillet&q2=&submit=Cercar I have added your suggestion to the patch although I hesitate. From your sources again it looks to me like "julhet" is the preferred form. Consequently, "jul." or "julh." (with a trailing dot) should be an abbreviated form of "julhet" since all other abbreviated forms hare a trailing dot. The abbreviation "julh" (without a dot) would look good to me only if "julh" was a full form (a case when the full form is so short that we don't need to abbreviate it at all). Again, I can't speak Occitan, this is just my guessing and I leave the final decision to the experts. [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111785.html
The master branch has been updated by Rafal Luzynski <rl@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=649fdf039b1572fca1880a6a643c857bde505456 commit 649fdf039b1572fca1880a6a643c857bde505456 Author: RafaÅ LużyÅski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> Date: Thu Mar 19 00:09:29 2020 +0100 oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of Thursday (bug 25639) As reported by a native speaker: Thursday: "dijóus" -> "dijòus" (also confirmed by CLDR)
(In reply to Rafal Luzynski from comment #3) > I've posted a patch here: [1] As I said, it is not meant to be complete. I > understand there are some obvious typos which must be fixed ASAP. > > (In reply to Quentin PAGÈS from comment #2) > > April has two forms, both are okay. > > https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/abril#oc > > It looks to me like "abril" is preferred while "abrial" being an alternative > spelling. What do you think? > > > Dimarç is wrong, [...] > > Can you please report it to CLDR? > > > To finish, July has two forms too... julh and julhet > > It may be a good idea to use «julh» for the short form of the month instead > > of «jul.» > > https://locongres.org/oc/aplicacions/dicodoc-oc/dicodoc- > > recerca?option=com_dicodoc&view=search&Itemid=168&type=fr- > > oc&dic%5B%5D=BASIC&dic%5B%5D=RBVD&dic%5B%5D=ALPC&dic%5B%5D=ATAU&dic%5B%5D=PRO > > V&dic%5B%5D=PNST&dic%5B%5D=OMLH&dic%5B%5D=LAUS&dic%5B%5D=LAGA&dic%5B%5D=LEMO& > > q=juillet&q2=&submit=Cercar > > I have added your suggestion to the patch although I hesitate. From your > sources again it looks to me like "julhet" is the preferred form. > Consequently, "jul." or "julh." (with a trailing dot) should be an > abbreviated form of "julhet" since all other abbreviated forms hare a > trailing dot. The abbreviation "julh" (without a dot) would look good to me > only if "julh" was a full form (a case when the full form is so short that > we don't need to abbreviate it at all). > > Again, I can't speak Occitan, this is just my guessing and I leave the final > decision to the experts. > > > [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111785.html Yes your reasoning is good to keep jul. About abril/abrial, well in standard it's the same, I think Abril is more used than Abrial. I don't have a preference nor an advice on it. Many thanks for your work!
Now as Thursday (dijòus) and April (abril) are fixed and you have agreed not to change "jul." to "julh", can we consider this bug as fixed?
(In reply to Rafal Luzynski from comment #6) > Now as Thursday (dijòus) and April (abril) are fixed and you have agreed not > to change "jul." to "julh", can we consider this bug as fixed? Yes totally, it’s brilliant. Many thanks
OK, done.
The release/2.31/master branch has been updated by Rafal Luzynski <rl@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=3b9ceb332049c711e02e7b95f9b20180115c9209 commit 3b9ceb332049c711e02e7b95f9b20180115c9209 Author: RafaÅ LużyÅski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> Date: Sat May 9 17:07:02 2020 +0200 NEWS: Mention bug 25639 fixed in 2.31 branch