Bug 19612 - relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object
Summary: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageV...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 17709
Alias: None
Product: binutils
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ld (show other bugs)
Version: 2.27
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-02-11 12:13 UTC by Markus Trippelsdorf
Modified: 2016-02-11 20:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Last reconfirmed:

Attachments
test object file (850.12 KB, application/x-bzip)
2016-02-11 12:13 UTC, Markus Trippelsdorf 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Markus Trippelsdorf 2016-02-11 12:13:17 UTC 
Created attachment 8976 [details]
test object file

Building Swift fails on binutils trunk:

 % ld.gold -shared Swift.o
 % ld.bfd  -shared Swift.o
ld.bfd: Swift.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object
ld.bfd: final link failed: Bad value
Comment 1 H.J. Lu 2016-02-11 19:01:36 UTC 
Is this a dup for PR 17709 and

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
Comment 2 Markus Trippelsdorf 2016-02-11 19:58:39 UTC 
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Is this a dup for PR 17709 and
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248

Well, Swift is build by clang, so gcc's PR65248 isn't relevant.

Why does linking succeed with gold?
Comment 3 H.J. Lu 2016-02-11 20:28:37 UTC 
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > Is this a dup for PR 17709 and
> > 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
> 
> Well, Swift is build by clang, so gcc's PR65248 isn't relevant.

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26580

> Why does linking succeed with gold?

That is a gold bug.  See the -fuse-ld=gold test in my GCC/clang bug reports.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 17709 ***