Created attachment 8863 [details] Test program for shared robust mutex with asynchronous termination I have a test program that sets up a process-shared robust mutex, and then forks a child that repeatedly locks and unlocks the mutex in a loop while the parent concurrently sends a signal to kill the child. It repeats this, forking a new child each time, until the required number of iterations complete and the program exists or the program stops making progress for some reason. Steps to reproduce ================== Compile and run the attached test program on a Linux system with at least two CPU cores. e.g. $ gcc -Wall -g test_robust.c -lpthread -o test_robust $ ./test_robust iteration 0 C-c C-c $ Actual results ============== The program stalls, on my system usually after less than 200 iterations. Expected results ================ I expect the program always to run to completion in a reasonable amount of time. The stalled state shouldn't exist because the robust mutex was either locked or unlocked at the time the child terminated, and so pthread_mutex_lock in the parent should return either EOWNERDEAD or no error, respectively. Test platform ============= Dual-core Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8600 @ 2.40GHz Linux debian8 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u1 (2015-12-14) x86_64 GNU/Linux Hosted under VMWare Fusion 4.1.4 on Mac OS X 10.6.8 Results are the same both with the stock debian jessie glibc (2.19-18+deb8) and with a glibc built on this system from git glibc sources as of commit 2cf3e1aa7477b813ca3ebb901003a7d44f970218 (2015-12-22 13:39:19 UTC). I have seen a similar test program exhibit the same problem on bare metal Red Hat Linux systems, so I don't think it is VMWare or Debian specific. Further details =============== I have done a few things to investigate this further. Firstly, in the stalled state the child process is definitely terminated but the parent process is stuck in a futex system call - see example session below: $ make test_robust cc -Wall -g -I/home/raoul/install/include -I /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9.2/include -I /usr/include -I /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu -L/home/raoul/install/lib -Wl,-rpath=/home/raoul/install/lib -Wl,--dynamic-linker=/home/raoul/install/lib/ld-2.22.90.so test_robust.c -lpthread -o test_robust $ ./test_robust & [1] 25446 $ iteration 0 iteration 100 $ ps PID TTY TIME CMD 25144 pts/2 00:00:00 bash 25446 pts/2 00:00:00 test_robust 25549 pts/2 00:00:00 ps $ cat /proc/$!/stack [<ffffffff810d18cc>] futex_wait_queue_me+0xcc/0x130 [<ffffffff810d1ba2>] futex_wait+0x162/0x260 [<ffffffff8108958a>] posix_cpu_timers_exit+0x1a/0x30 [<ffffffff810d3d22>] do_futex+0xf2/0xb60 [<ffffffff810a76b2>] remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50 [<ffffffff810694fc>] do_wait+0x11c/0x230 [<ffffffff810d47fe>] SyS_futex+0x6e/0x150 [<ffffffff81068410>] child_wait_callback+0x0/0x60 [<ffffffff81513ccd>] system_call_fast_compare_end+0x10/0x15 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff Secondly, it is possible to attach gdb to the parent and inspect the state of the mutex in the stalled state, which (I think) shows the mutex is "locked" by the terminated child process: $ gdb -p $! GNU gdb (Debian 7.7.1+dfsg-5) 7.7.1 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu". Type "show configuration" for configuration details. For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. For help, type "help". Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word". Attaching to process 25446 Reading symbols from /home/raoul/c/test_robust...done. Reading symbols from /home/raoul/install/lib/libpthread.so.0...done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/home/raoul/install/lib/libthread_db.so.1". Loaded symbols for /home/raoul/install/lib/libpthread.so.0 Reading symbols from /home/raoul/install/lib/libc.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /home/raoul/install/lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /home/raoul/install/lib/ld-2.22.90.so...done. Loaded symbols for /home/raoul/install/lib/ld-2.22.90.so __lll_robust_lock_wait () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevelrobustlock.S:85 85 movl (%rdi), %eax (gdb) frame 3 #3 0x0000000000401190 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7ffde4bc39d8) at test_robust.c:137 137 do_lock(shared); (gdb) set print pretty (gdb) print *shared $1 = { mutex = { __data = { __lock = -2147458100, __count = 1, __owner = 0, __nusers = 0, __kind = 656, __spins = 0, __elision = 0, __list = { __prev = 0x0, __next = 0x0 } }, __size = "\314c\000\200\001", '\000' <repeats 11 times>, "\220\002", '\000' <repeats 21 times>, __align = 6442476492 }, child_state = 2, child_pid = 25548, reclaims = 95 } (gdb) print/x shared->mutex.__data.__lock $2 = 0x800063cc (gdb) print shared->mutex.__data.__lock & 0xffff $3 = 25548 (gdb) print shared->child_pid $4 = 25548 (gdb) quit A debugging session is active. Inferior 1 [process 25446] will be detached. Quit anyway? (y or n) y Detaching from program: /home/raoul/c/test_robust, process 25446 $ kill %%; wait %% [1]+ Terminated ./test_robust Finally, it is possible to parameterize the test program such that it sends the child a SIGABRT instead of a SIGTERM, which causes it to dump core. This allows us to see where the child process was executing when it terminated. In my case, I have no corefile pattern on the system so the same corefile gets repeatedly overwritten until the parent stalls: $ ulimit -c unlimited $ ./test_robust 200 6 & [1] 26200 $ iteration 0 iteration 100 $ gdb test_robust core [snip] Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007f52d0a23735 in __pthread_mutex_lock_full (mutex=0x7f52d0e55000) at ../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:256 256 oldval = LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK (mutex, id); (gdb) disas Dump of assembler code for function __pthread_mutex_lock_full: [snip] 0x00007f52d0a23710 <+768>: and $0x40000000,%eax 0x00007f52d0a23715 <+773>: jne 0x7f52d0a237b8 <__pthread_mutex_lock_full+936> 0x00007f52d0a2371b <+779>: and $0x3fffffff,%edx 0x00007f52d0a23721 <+785>: cmp %edx,%ebp 0x00007f52d0a23723 <+787>: je 0x7f52d0a23815 <__pthread_mutex_lock_full+1029> 0x00007f52d0a23729 <+793>: mov %ebp,%edi 0x00007f52d0a2372b <+795>: mov %r10d,%eax 0x00007f52d0a2372e <+798>: mov %r9d,%esi 0x00007f52d0a23731 <+801>: lock cmpxchg %edi,(%rbx) => 0x00007f52d0a23735 <+805>: je 0x7f52d0a2374d <__pthread_mutex_lock_full+829> 0x00007f52d0a23737 <+807>: lea (%rbx),%rdi 0x00007f52d0a2373a <+810>: sub $0x80,%rsp 0x00007f52d0a23741 <+817>: callq 0x7f52d0a29e50 <__lll_robust_lock_wait> [snip] End of assembler dump. (gdb) info reg eflags eflags 0x246 [ PF ZF IF ] (gdb) where #0 0x00007f52d0a23735 in __pthread_mutex_lock_full (mutex=0x7f52d0e55000) at ../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:256 #1 0x0000000000400e04 in run_child (shared=0x7f52d0e55000) at test_robust.c:62 #2 0x0000000000400f0b in do_fork (shared=0x7f52d0e55000) at test_robust.c:81 #3 0x000000000040119c in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fff630d1cd8) at test_robust.c:138 (gdb) frame 3 #3 0x000000000040119c in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fff630d1cd8) at test_robust.c:138 138 do_fork(shared); (gdb) set print pretty (gdb) print *shared $1 = { mutex = { __data = { __lock = 26301, __count = 1, __owner = 0, __nusers = 0, __kind = 656, __spins = 0, __elision = 0, __list = { __prev = 0x0, __next = 0x0 } }, __size = "\275f\000\000\001", '\000' <repeats 11 times>, "\220\002", '\000' <repeats 21 times>, __align = 4294993597 }, child_state = 2, child_pid = 26301, reclaims = 89 } (gdb) print/x shared->mutex $2 = { __data = { __lock = 0x66bd, __count = 0x1, __owner = 0x0, __nusers = 0x0, __kind = 0x290, __spins = 0x0, __elision = 0x0, __list = { __prev = 0x0, __next = 0x0 } }, __size = {0xbd, 0x66, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1, 0x0 <repeats 11 times>, 0x90, 0x2, 0x0 <repeats 22 times>}, __align = 0x1000066bd } Here is another slightly different case where the child terminated after the LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK, but before (or during) the ENQUEUE_MUTEX: Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007f892a4f0777 in __pthread_mutex_lock_full (mutex=0x7f892a922000) at ../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:272 272 ENQUEUE_MUTEX (mutex); (gdb) disas [snip] 0x00007f892a4f075f <+847>: movl $0x1,0x4(%rbx) 0x00007f892a4f0766 <+854>: mov %fs:0x2e0,%rax 0x00007f892a4f076f <+863>: and $0xfffffffffffffffe,%rax 0x00007f892a4f0773 <+867>: mov %r8,-0x8(%rax) => 0x00007f892a4f0777 <+871>: mov %fs:0x2e0,%rax 0x00007f892a4f0780 <+880>: mov %rax,0x20(%rbx) [snip] Speculation =========== My theory is that there are at least some points in the execution of pthread_mutex_lock and/or pthread_mutex_unlock where an asynchronous termination signal can leave the mutex in a locked state which the kernel does not resolve during termination. In the example termination points above, the LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK has completed but the mutex has not yet been added to the thread-specific robust mutex list. This kind of termination is not likely, but is possible via an external process sending a signal (as in this test) or another thread in the same program encountering a SEGV or such like.
I can reproduce this issue with a cleaned up testcase that uses C11 atomics to avoid the data races in the orignal test case. Torvald Riegel, Florian Weimer and I discussed this and the final analysis is that this is clearly a flaw in the glibc handling of the robust list. The sequence of events isn't even that complicated. P1 -> set_robust_list -> setup shared mapping, setup shared mutex -> lock mutex (eunqueues it onto the robust list) -> fork child -> unlock mutex (dequeues it from the list) Note: The deuque here removes the mutex from the robust list copy in the parent, but he child's copy of the robust list head is unchanged and pointing to the mutex. However, that mutex now has it's own ->next pointer set to null so it is no longer a valid list according to the kernel. P2 -> locks mutex (owner not dead, doesn't own it, so locks it) P1 -> Kills P2 Kernel -> Inspects P2's robust list, find it contains a head that points to a mutex that points to NULL. This is a dangling list and the cleanup is ignored. P1 -> locks mutex (and deadlocks). At this point no recovery is possible. The key issue is that the mutex itself, in shared memory, is part of the circular linked list itself. The robust list head itself is stored in the process/thread-local storage, but the rest of the list is shared, made up of the mutexes that are involved in the list. Therefore P1 and P2 share parts of their own robust lists via the shared mutex's afer the fork. This is a flaw really because the mutexes can only be owned by one thread at a time. When P2 is forked we need to do some kind of cleanup of the head of the list, probably clearing head (linking it back to itself to make an empty list) just after forking.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU C Library master sources". The branch, master has been updated via 8e31cafb268938729a1314806a924d73fb1991c5 (commit) via 65810f0ef05e8c9e333f17a44e77808b163ca298 (commit) from f32941d80c7f532031061f8dd4704fab9c275cfe (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=8e31cafb268938729a1314806a924d73fb1991c5 commit 8e31cafb268938729a1314806a924d73fb1991c5 Author: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> Date: Wed Dec 21 13:37:19 2016 +0100 Clear list of acquired robust mutexes in the child process after forking. Robust mutexes acquired at the time of a call to fork() do not remain acquired by the forked child process. We have to clear the list of acquired robust mutexes before registering this list with the kernel; otherwise, if some of the robust mutexes are process-shared, the parent process can alter the child's robust mutex list, which can lead to deadlocks or even modification of memory that may not be occupied by a mutex anymore. [BZ #19402] * sysdeps/nptl/fork.c (__libc_fork): Clear list of acquired robust mutexes. https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=65810f0ef05e8c9e333f17a44e77808b163ca298 commit 65810f0ef05e8c9e333f17a44e77808b163ca298 Author: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> Date: Thu Dec 22 10:20:43 2016 +0100 robust mutexes: Fix broken x86 assembly by removing it lll_robust_unlock on i386 and x86_64 first sets the futex word to FUTEX_WAITERS|0 before calling __lll_unlock_wake, which will set the futex word to 0. If the thread is killed between these steps, then the futex word will be FUTEX_WAITERS|0, and the kernel (at least current upstream) will not set it to FUTEX_OWNER_DIED|FUTEX_WAITERS because 0 is not equal to the TID of the crashed thread. The lll_robust_lock assembly code on i386 and x86_64 is not prepared to deal with this case because the fastpath tries to only CAS 0 to TID and not FUTEX_WAITERS|0 to TID; the slowpath simply waits until it can CAS 0 to TID or the futex_word has the FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit set. This issue is fixed by removing the custom x86 assembly code and using the generic C code instead. However, instead of adding more duplicate code to the custom x86 lowlevellock.h, the code of the lll_robust* functions is inlined into the single call sites that exist for each of these functions in the pthread_mutex_* functions. The robust mutex paths in the latter have been slightly reorganized to make them simpler. This patch is meant to be easy to backport, so C11-style atomics are not used. [BZ #20985] * nptl/Makefile: Adapt. * nptl/pthread_mutex_cond_lock.c (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK): Remove. (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New. * nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK): Remove. (LLL_ROBUST_MUTEX_LOCK_MODIFIER): New. (__pthread_mutex_lock_full): Inline lll_robust* functions and adapt. * nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c (pthread_mutex_timedlock): Inline lll_robust* functions and adapt. * nptl/pthread_mutex_unlock.c (__pthread_mutex_unlock_full): Likewise. * sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h (__lll_robust_lock_wait, __lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, __lll_robust_timedlock_wait, __lll_robust_timedlock, __lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h (lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, lll_robust_timedlock, lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.h (lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, lll_robust_timedlock, lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/lowlevellock.h (__lll_robust_lock_wait, __lll_robust_lock, lll_robust_cond_lock, __lll_robust_timedlock_wait, __lll_robust_timedlock, __lll_robust_unlock): Remove. * nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c: Remove file. * nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.sym: Likewise. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevelrobustlock.S: Likewise. * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevelrobustlock.S: Likewise. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: ChangeLog | 33 ++ nptl/Makefile | 4 +- nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c | 136 --------- nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.sym | 6 - nptl/pthread_mutex_cond_lock.c | 6 +- nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c | 79 ++++-- nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c | 106 ++++++-- nptl/pthread_mutex_unlock.c | 18 +- sysdeps/nptl/fork.c | 20 +- sysdeps/nptl/lowlevellock.h | 68 ----- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h | 60 ---- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevelrobustlock.S | 232 --------------- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/lowlevellock.h | 40 --- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.h | 74 ----- .../unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevelrobustlock.S | 306 -------------------- 15 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 983 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.c delete mode 100644 nptl/lowlevelrobustlock.sym delete mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevelrobustlock.S delete mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevelrobustlock.S
Fixed in master.