Bug 18002 - gdb/infrun.c:2114: internal-error: resume: Assertion `tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint->loc->permanent' failed.
Summary: gdb/infrun.c:2114: internal-error: resume: Assertion `tp->control.step_resume...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: gdb
Classification: Unclassified
Component: gdb (show other bugs)
Version: HEAD
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pedro Alves
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-02-20 12:08 UTC by Yao Qi
Modified: 2015-03-05 23:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
Build:
Last reconfirmed:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Yao Qi 2015-02-20 12:08:34 UTC
I see the internal error below in gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp in aarch64-linux-gnu target.

(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: stepi signal with handler: stop at permanent breakpoint
queue-signal SIGUSR1^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: stepi signal with handler: queue-signal SIGUSR1
stepi^M
gdb/infrun.c:2114: internal-error: resume: Assertion `tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint->loc->permanent' failed.^M
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,^M
further debugging may prove unreliable.^M
Quit this debugging session? (y or n) FAIL: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: stepi signal with handler: single-step to handler (GDB internal error)
Resyncing due to internal error.

Further analysis is needed.
Comment 1 Yao Qi 2015-02-20 12:14:58 UTC
This internal error is only shown on remote/cross testing.  In the native testing (without gdbserver), the internal error goes away:

(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=on, sw_watchpoint=1: stepi signal with handler: stop at permanent breakpoint
queue-signal SIGUSR1^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=on, sw_watchpoint=1: stepi signal with handler: queue-signal SIGUSR1
stepi^M
47        NOP; /* after permanent bp */^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=on, sw_watchpoint=1: stepi signal with handler: single-step to handler
Comment 2 Pedro Alves 2015-03-05 21:44:02 UTC
The ppc64 buildbots are showing this as well.  I've got a patch.
Comment 3 Pedro Alves 2015-03-05 21:44:21 UTC
Mine.
Comment 4 Sourceware Commits 2015-03-05 23:41:57 UTC
The master branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=68901c4d439ebceecab927932c17ea1504747c02

commit 68901c4d439ebceecab927932c17ea1504747c02
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 5 23:39:45 2015 +0000

    PR gdb/18002: Fix reinsert of a permanent breakpoints
    
    When we find out that a breakpoint is set on top of a program
    breakpoint, we mark it as "permanent".  E.g.,:
    
    ...
      if (bp_loc_is_permanent (loc))
        {
          loc->inserted = 1;
          loc->permanent = 1;
        }
    ...
    
    Note we didn't fill in the breakpoint's shadow (shadow_len remains 0).
    
    In case the target claims support for evaluating breakpoint
    conditions, GDB sometimes reinserts breakpoints that are already
    inserted (to update the conditions on the target side).  Since GDB
    doesn't know whether the target supports evaluating conditions _of_
    software breakpoints (vs hardware breakpoints, etc.) until it actually
    tries it, if the target doesn't actually support z0 breakpoints, GDB
    ends up reinserting a GDB-managed software/memory breakpoint
    (mem-break.c).
    
    And that is the case that is buggy: breakpoints that are marked
    inserted contribute their shadows (if any) to the memory returned by
    target_read_memory, to mask out breakpoints.  Permanent breakpoints
    are always marked as inserted.  So if the permanent breakpoint doesn't
    have a shadow yet in its shadow buffer, but we set shadow_len before
    calling target_read_memory, then the still clear shadow_contents
    buffer will be used by the breakpoint masking code...  And then from
    there on, the permanent breakpoint has a broken shadow buffer, and
    thus any memory read out of that address will read bogus code, and
    many random bad things fall out from that.
    
    The fix is just to set shadow_len at the same time shadow_contents is
    set, not one before and another after...
    
    Fixes all gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp FAILs on PPC64 GNU/Linux gdbserver
    and probably any other gdbserver port that doesn't do z0 breakpoints.
    
    gdb/ChangeLog:
    2015-03-05  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
    
    	PR gdb/18002
    	* mem-break.c (default_memory_insert_breakpoint): Set shadow_len
    	after reading the breakpoint's shadow memory.
Comment 5 Pedro Alves 2015-03-05 23:44:26 UTC
Fixed.