Bug 9302 - gdb uses && instead of & in 2 places
Summary: gdb uses && instead of & in 2 places
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: gdb
Classification: Unclassified
Component: sim (show other bugs)
Version: unknown
: P3 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-10 08:28 UTC by Marcus Meissner
Modified: 2011-11-07 16:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Last reconfirmed:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marcus Meissner 2006-11-10 08:28:01 UTC 
[Converted from Gnats 2197]

./BASE/gdb/gdb-6.5.tar.bz2.contents/gdb-6.5/sim/mn10300/dv-mn103iop.c:    if ( (buf && 0xfc)  != 0 )
./BASE/gdb/gdb-6.5.tar.bz2.contents/gdb-6.5/sim/mn10300/dv-mn103iop.c:    if ( (buf && 0xf0) != 0 )


these 2 should be & instead

Release:
unknown
Comment 2 Mike Frysinger 2011-11-07 16:26:37 UTC 
committed aforementioned fix