Bug 3560 - ``Lowlevel primitives for ld.so not implemented''
Summary: ``Lowlevel primitives for ld.so not implemented''
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: glibc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: hurd (show other bugs)
Version: 2.4
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Roland McGrath
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-22 13:53 UTC by Thomas Schwinge
Modified: 2016-05-08 14:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Last reconfirmed:
fweimer: security-

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Thomas Schwinge 2006-11-22 13:53:13 UTC 
#v+
[...]
In file included from ../include/link.h:47,
                 from ../include/dlfcn.h:3,
                 from ../sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h:32,
                 from ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c:32:
../sysdeps/generic/rtld-lowlevel.h:1:2: error: #error "Lowlevel primitives for
ld.so not implemented"
In file included from ../include/dlfcn.h:3,
                 from ../sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h:32,
                 from ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c:32:
../include/link.h:224: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'__rtld_mrlock_define'
In file included from ../sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h:41,
                 from ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c:32:
../sysdeps/generic/rtld-lowlevel.h:1:2: error: #error "Lowlevel primitives for
ld.so not implemented"
[...]
#v-
Comment 1 Samuel Thibault 2007-07-21 21:45:56 UTC 
This is not needed in CVS HEAD any more.  Debian has a workaround for 2.6.