Created attachment 5704 [details] Patch for fr_CA While looking at en_CA and comparing it to fr_CA, I realized there was a small error. First weekday should be 1 (Sunday/Dimanche) instead of 2 (Monday/Lundi). Submitting a patch.
Created attachment 5705 [details] Patch for fr_CA
Comment on attachment 5704 [details] Patch for fr_CA First file submitted was the whole file, not the patch. Sorry
(In reply to comment #0) > While looking at en_CA and comparing it to fr_CA, I realized there was a small > error. First weekday should be 1 (Sunday/Dimanche) instead of 2 (Monday/Lundi). > Submitting a patch. Did you even look at the glibc sources? There is no first_weekday entry and therefore the information is already correct. I have no idea what crappy distribution you're using but they modified the sources without any knowledge.
As a follow up, Ubuntu bug filed in 2010 about this problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/langpack-locales/+bug/517397
(In reply to comment #4) > As a follow up, Ubuntu bug filed in 2010 about this problem: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/langpack-locales/+bug/517397 Wrong bug number, the link is for en_CA.
Ulrich, by the way you are answering, you seem upset but I don't understand why. The distribution used is Ubuntu 11.04. It's true, I hadn't looked at the "latest" git version. Downloading a complete git repo for a single file looked over killed, since 11.04 is pretty much the latest Ubuntu version available. I had assumed wrongly that the file was up-to-date. Now that I downloaded the latest git version, I confirm this patch is uneeded. So letting this bug closed. I'll open one with Ubuntu.