Xconq RPM's

[Hans Ronne]

>> I am now labeling the RPM's with the snapshot date instead of
>> 7.5.0. So these RPM's are xconq-20031007-1.
>
>xconq-7.5.0.20031007-1 would be less likely to confuse RPM's version
>number logic.  Or xconq-7.4.20031007 would also work (except that it
>wouldn't show up as newer than xconq-7.5.0-1 through xconq-7.5.0-3).
>
>Unless of course you want to play with the RPM epoch, which is more of
>a last ditch technique than the preferred way to do it.

I think we should avoid calling things 7.5.0 until we have a 7.5.0.
xconq-7.4.20031007 sounds fine to me. Or just the snapshot date, as Eric
suggested.

Hans