[Bug tapsets/30407] Tapset function print_ubacktrace_fileline() no longer works on kernel 6.2/6.1
mcermak at redhat dot com
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Thu Jun 8 14:27:44 GMT 2023
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30407
Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mcermak at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> ---
This can be replicated with rhel8 (works) versusus rhel9 (doesn't work). But I
don't think it's related to kernel: After copying my test binary from rhel8
over to rhel9 (and making sure it's md5-identical, things started to work even
on rhel9!
The following comes from my rhel8 binary where things work fine:
> 8 x86_64 # eu-readelf --debug-dump=info a.out
>
> DWARF section [26] '.debug_info' at offset 0x2e70:
> [Offset]
> Compilation unit at offset 0:
> Version: 4, Abbreviation section offset: 0, Address size: 8, Offset size: 4
> [ b] compile_unit abbrev: 1
> producer (strp) "GNU C17 8.5.0 20210514 (Red Hat 8.5.0-19) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -g"
> language (data1) C99 (12)
> name (strp) "test.c"
> comp_dir (strp) "/root/build"
> low_pc (addr) 0x0000000000400536 <main>
> high_pc (data8) 11 (0x0000000000400541)
> stmt_list (sec_offset) 0
> [ 2d] subprogram abbrev: 2
> external (flag_present) yes
> name (strp) "main"
> decl_file (data1) test.c (1)
> decl_line (data1) 1
> decl_column (data1) 5
> prototyped (flag_present) yes
> type (ref4) [ 4b]
> low_pc (addr) 0x0000000000400536 <main>
> high_pc (data8) 11 (0x0000000000400541)
> frame_base (exprloc)
> [ 0] call_frame_cfa
> GNU_all_call_sites (flag_present) yes
> [ 4b] base_type abbrev: 3
> byte_size (data1) 4
> encoding (data1) signed (5)
> name (string) "int"
> 8 x86_64 #
Now here's what my rhel9 binary shows:
> 9 x86_64 # eu-readelf --debug-dump=info a.out
>
> DWARF section [27] '.debug_info' at offset 0x47a0:
> [Offset]
> Compilation unit at offset 0:
> Version: 5, Abbreviation section offset: 0, Address size: 8, Offset size: 4
> Unit type: compile (1)
> [ c] compile_unit abbrev: 1
> producer (strp) "GNU C17 11.3.1 20221121 (Red Hat 11.3.1-4) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64-v2 -g"
> language (data1) C11 (29)
> name (line_strp) "test.c"
> comp_dir (line_strp) "/root/build"
> low_pc (addr) 0x0000000000401106 <main>
> high_pc (data8) 11 (0x0000000000401111)
> stmt_list (sec_offset) 0
> [ 2e] subprogram abbrev: 2
> external (flag_present) yes
> name (strp) "main"
> decl_file (data1) test.c (1)
> decl_line (data1) 1
> decl_column (data1) 5
> prototyped (flag_present) yes
> type (ref4) [ 4c]
> low_pc (addr) 0x0000000000401106 <main>
> high_pc (data8) 11 (0x0000000000401111)
> frame_base (exprloc)
> [ 0] call_frame_cfa
> call_all_calls (flag_present) yes
> [ 4c] base_type abbrev: 3
> byte_size (data1) 4
> encoding (data1) signed (5)
> name (string) "int"
> 9 x86_64 #
I've verified that -march, doesn't cause the difference. But enforcing DWARF4
on rhel9 with `gcc -gdwarf-4` makes things work again on rhel9! So I think
it's the DWARF version that makes the difference :)
The print_ubacktrace_fileline() call propagates down to
_stp_linenumber_lookup(address, task, &filename, ...) which already returns the
NULL filename. Stepping in, this calls _stp_linenumber_lookup(), which returns
struct _stp_module with a NULL debug_line member. Looking farther...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list