[PATCH] stap/staprun do not terminate properly

[David Smith]

On 03/10/2014 05:36 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 03/07/2014 01:09 PM, David Smith wrote:
>> So, instead I did this:
>>
>> ====
>> stap_stap_task_finder()
>> {
>>   // ...
>>
>>   __stp_tf_cancel_task_work();
>>
>>   // Note that utrace_exit() calls stp_task_work_exit()
>>   utrace_exit();
>> }
>> ====
>>
>> This moves canceling all outstanding task_work items before shutting
>> down utrace (and calling stp_task_work_exit()). I think the end result
>> is the same as your patch, and I think this makes a little more sense.
>> This way we've canceled all the task_work items before shutting down
>> utrace (and freeing all the memory allocated for utrace).
>>
>> If this doesn't work for you or you see a hole in this logic please let
>> me know.
> 
> I notice that utrace_exit() calls utrace_shutdown(), but so does
> __stp_task_finder_cleanup() earlier in stap_stop_task_finder().  So in
> fact the shutdown is still happening before canceling this work, and the
> only thing left for utrace_exit() is the kmem_cache_destroy and
> stp_task_work_exit().  Do you think this could be a problem?
> 
> In particular, I worry about this comment:
> 
>   /* After calling tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(), we're
>    * sure there are no outstanding tracepoint probes being
>    * called.  So, now would be a great time to free everything. */
> 
> There won't be any outstanding tracepoint handlers, but couldn't there
> still be outstanding task_work scheduled from those handlers?
> 

I went over this code yesterday, and just committed a patch (commit
6628352) that tightens things up here. This patch fixes a crash that
Jonathan was seeing. The patch make sure that all the tracepoint probes
and task work items are finished running before the kmem caches are freed.

-- 
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)