[Bug translator/11207] Support preprocessor macros

[smakarov at redhat dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11207

Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |smakarov at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> 2012-06-01 18:03:47 UTC ---
Currently mulling over the two directions (m4, or a custom preprocessor). Still
in progress, but by now it's worthwhile to post the current 'best' ideas as
attachments.

The next step is probably to consider the more natural invocation syntax
mentioned at the bottom of the custom proposal and to try to see what happens
if I just start using m4 in a more adhoc (and potentially ugly) manner, rather
than trying to design-specify-build some comprehensive define_probe_template
macro.

--- Comment #3 from Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> 2012-06-01 18:04:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 6432
  --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6432
First version of proposal for just using m4

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.