Tune reader_thread poll timeout value

Mark Wielaard mjw@redhat.com
Thu May 3 08:33:00 GMT 2012


On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:14:58AM +0000, Turgis, Frederic wrote:
> >That's an important point, that this tunable as you've implemented it is
> >built into stapio, not into individual modules, so it's much more
> >static.  Maybe this would be better as a command-line option to
> >staprun/stapio?  (like the current -b buffer size)
> 
> But if systemtap experts feel it is worth exposing it like -b option,
> we will of course patch accordingly, this would be the most flexible
> solution !

Yes, I think that would be the nicest solution.
I had previously missed this was part of stapio and not of the module
runtime.

Thanks,

Mark



More information about the Systemtap mailing list