uprobes-inode.c:262: error: implicit declaration of function 'uprobe_register'
Negreanu Marius
groleo@gmail.com
Mon Apr 9 20:17:00 GMT 2012
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 12:42 PM, Negreanu Marius wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/09/2012 05:19 AM, Negreanu Marius wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Negreanu Marius <groleo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> on latest master, I'm getting this error:
>>>>> uprobes-inode.c:262: error: implicit declaration of function
>>>>> 'uprobe_register'
>>>>>
>>>>> I can see that STAPCONF_UPROBE_REGISTER_EXPORTED controls when
>>>>> uprobe_register is defined,
>>>>> but I don't know where should uprobe_register come from when
>>>>> STAPCONF_UPROBE_REGISTER_EXPORTED is 1 .
>>>>
>>>> Heh,
>>>> <linux/wait.h> was not included by asm/uprobes.h
>>>> and ./runtime/autoconf-old-inode-uprobes.c was failing because of this.
>>>>
>>>> The failing of the autoconf test meant undefined
>>>> STAPCONF_UPROBE_REGISTER_EXPORTED .
>>>
>>> Aha, good sleuthing. If necessary, we can just add that #include to our
>>> autoconf as a workaround. But if uprobes.h is using definitions from
>>> wait.h, it ought to make the #include itself. (cc srikar)
>>
>> kernel uprobes.h is using a wait_queue but forgets include wait.h directly;
>> so it's the kernel duty to have the includes done right; otherwise, I guess
>> all #include <uprobes.h> that are done in the autoconf*.c would have
>> to be prepended
>> by the missing includes.
>
> AFAICS, the current development version of uprobes no longer uses
> wait_queue. So we could add the #include for compatibility with that
> interim version, but upstream it won't matter.
>
> That particular autoconf that tripped you up is only intended for
> compatibility as well, so I guess we might as well do this.
Good point !
> Can you
> test and confirm, is it enough just to add "#include <linux/wait.h>" to
> autoconf-old-inode-uprobes.c to get things working?
I'll be able to test this tomorow (which is 9hrs away for me)
and I'll get back with the results.
Thanks,
Marius
results.
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list