towards zero FAIL for make installcheck

[Dave Brolley]

On 12/01/2011 06:57 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> As you can see the low number of FAILs (unexpected failures) is
> compensated by a high number of KFAILs (known failures) and UNTESTED
The recent spike in the number of UNTESTED was me reducing the number of 
tests run by the unprivileged_embedded_C.exp test. I simply changed it 
to test on a fraction of the tapset functions in our library and to 
report the rest as UNTESTED. The test still covers all variants of no 
embedded C/unprivileged/myproc-unprivileged.

It was an arbitrary decision on my part to report the skipped functions 
as UNTESTED. If it is preferred, I could change it to simply ignore them.

Dave