Proposal for PR 13128

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi -

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:16:35PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> [...]
> > Actually, it doesn't.  Since it's signed, staprun can trust the module
> > to do the verification itself.  It could just pass bit-flags as to the
> > invoking user's stapdev|stapkern|stapusr group memberships, and let
> > the module itself assess eligibility to run.
> 
> We require new code either way -- parsing section contents vs. creating
> a new control message to the module.  I feel it's more prudent to do as
> much as possible before init_module is ever called.

Right, on the other hand, creation of the extra elf data, and its
signature-related processing, is extra work and a possible source of
fragility with this approach.  Prudence is not clear-cut.

- FChE