Does This Probe Make Sense?

[Josh Stone]

On 09/06/2011 08:04 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> So IMO, get rid of the .function(NUM).inline binding, and make sure that
>> addresses in an inline still reach out to the containing .call.
> 
> What do you mean by that last statement about "reach out"?

Perhaps "reach up" would have been better, as in up the die hierarchy. I
meant that given an address within an inline instance, we should still
get a probe on the containing function.

Josh