Question regarding userspace tracing memcpy in glibc
Frank Ch. Eigler
fche@redhat.com
Fri Dec 10 17:49:00 GMT 2010
"Ariel Shaqed (Scolnicov)" <ariels@correlix.com> writes:
> [...]
> I believe the problem is much worse. Usually no functions are called
> for memcpy (GCC implements them as intrinsics). [...]
You're right, and moreover, gcc doesn't emit any metadata. I'll ask
our compiler folks to investigate the possibility of producing dwarf
data for a pretend-inlined-memcpy.
- FChE
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list