uprobes and empty functions

[Josh Stone]

On 11/01/2010 01:14 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> Attached.  I'm refusing to probe any of those "special" instructions if
> they have a prefix, with the sole exception of "rep ret" because we can
> make sense of that.  (I only diffed uprobes2 this time, but of course
> the others need the same fix...)

Here's another iteration.  This time I addressed the TODO that
uprobe_post_ssout should use flags, which makes the code a bit nicer.
Reviews welcome...

Thanks,
Josh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: uprobes-ssout-flags.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6729 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/systemtap/attachments/20101101/32fda643/attachment.bin>