[Bug translator/6880] more syntax for shared library probing

jistone at redhat dot com sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Thu Oct 29 23:50:00 GMT 2009


------- Additional Comments From jistone at redhat dot com  2009-10-29 23:50 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> This would resolve the exact library file via heuristics like ldd,
> and constrain the uprobes to only named processes.
>   probe process("ls").library("libc").function/statement(...) { }

I was recently reminded of the perils of ldd vs. a custom --dynamic-linker, so
we should tread carefully here...

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6880

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.



More information about the Systemtap mailing list