[Bug translator/10537] process().function().label() doesn't select multiple inlined instances
mjw at redhat dot com
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Thu Aug 20 14:42:00 GMT 2009
------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com 2009-08-20 14:41 -------
commit 30868aad20865f5a949c22ad0a20d1ebe2fd669a
Author: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Aug 20 16:31:55 2009 +0200
PR10537 process().function().label() should select multiple inlined instances.
This is less useful than one would hope. gcc will often emit a label with
a DW_AT_low_pc that is not really in the neighbourhood of where one would
expect it when the label is inlined and gcc can proof the label isn't really
used in the optimized code. dwflpp::iterate_over_labels will now really
iterate recursively through the die, even for dies without a name (like
lexical blocks). This means we should now always find the concrete inlined
label instances that have a real DW_AT_low_pc and so we don't need the trick
to use the line table to get at the actual address.
* dwflpp.cxx (iterate_over_labels): Accept dies without a name. Don't handle
labels without a name or without a lowpc attribute.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.c (m): Trick gcc into thinking label
is always used.
(call, call2): Activate.
(main): Call call and call2.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.exp: New result_string.
Test both unoptimized and optimized (inlined) builds.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10537
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list