test results and new release?

[Wenji Huang]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It would be nice to push out a new release seeing all the improvements
> and bug fixes gone over the last month. Are there any showstoppers that
> people think should be fixed before doing one?
> 
Test results on 2.6.30-rc7.
Host: Linux dhcp-beijing-cdc-10-182-121-35.cn.oracle.com 2.6.30-rc7 #11 
SMP Sun May 17 13:51:21 EDT 2009 i686 i68
6 i386 GNU/Linux
Snapshot: version 0.9.7/0.137 commit release-0.9.7-166-gc9116e9
Distro: Enterprise Linux Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Carthage)
FAIL: LOCAL1 (0)
FAIL: backtrace (1 0)
FAIL: backtrace-unwindsyms (1 0)
FAIL: cmd_parse1: unexpected EOF
FAIL: debugpath-good (eof)
FAIL: global_end (11)
FAIL: gtod (0)
FAIL: skip tracking (timeout)
FAIL: skip tracking (2 0)
FAIL: systemtap.base/tracepoints.stp
FAIL: buildok/nfsd-all-probes.stp
FAIL: buildok/seventeen.stp
FAIL: semok/twentyseven.stp
FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp shutdown (eof)
FAIL: 32-bit net1

                 === systemtap Summary ===
# of expected passes            681
# of unexpected failures        15
# of unexpected successes       9
# of expected failures          200
# of unknown successes          1
# of known failures             6
# of untested testcases         62

Analysis:
FAIL: systemtap.base/tracepoints.stp
    (Random, Timeout causes it)
FAIL: buildok/nfsd-all-probes.stp
    (nfs configuration related)
FAIL: buildok/seventeen.stp
    (nfs configuration related)
FAIL: semok/twentyseven.stp
    (scsi configuration related)

Tests on EL5U2 2.6.18-92.el5.
Host: Linux dhcp-beijing-cdc-10-182-121-43.cn.oracle.com 2.6.18-92.el5 
#1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:15 EDT 2008 x86_64
  x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Snapshot: version 0.9.7/0.137 commit release-0.9.7-182-ge905aa1
Distro: Enterprise Linux Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Carthage)
FAIL: LOCAL1 (0)
FAIL: backtrace (1 0)
FAIL: backtrace-unwindsyms (1 0)
FAIL: bz10078 -p5 (0)
FAIL: cmd_parse1: unexpected EOF
FAIL: gtod (100)
FAIL: sdt ""
FAIL: sdt c++ additional_flags="-O3"
FAIL: skip tracking (timeout)
FAIL: skip tracking (2 0)
FAIL: 32_BIT_UTRACE_SYSCALL_ARGS shutdown (eof)
FAIL: systemtap.examples/network/dropwatch build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/network/dropwatch run
FAIL: systemtap.examples/network/tcpdumplike run
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/schedtimes build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/schedtimes run
FAIL: buildok/seventeen.stp
FAIL: buildok/tcp-all-probes.stp
FAIL: buildok/twentyfive.stp
FAIL: 64-bit futimes
FAIL: 64-bit swap

                 === systemtap Summary ===
# of expected passes            729
# of unexpected failures        21
# of unexpected successes       8
# of expected failures          203
# of unknown successes          2
# of known failures             4
# of untested testcases         27
# of unsupported tests          2

Analysis:
FAIL: sdt ""
FAIL: sdt c++ additional_flags="-O3"
  (specific compiler on EL5)
FAIL: bz10078 -p5 (0)
FAIL: 32_BIT_UTRACE_SYSCALL_ARGS shutdown (eof)
  (old utrace kernel in EL5)
FAIL: systemtap.examples/network/dropwatch build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/network/dropwatch run
  (no trace point)
FAIL: systemtap.examples/network/tcpdumplike run
  (semantic error: no location for field 'raw')
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/schedtimes build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/schedtimes run
  (no trace point)
FAIL: buildok/seventeen.stp
  (*** glibc detected *** stap: corrupted double-linked list: 
0x0000000010dd8490 ***)
FAIL: buildok/tcp-all-probes.stp
  (semantic error: no location for field 'raw')
FAIL: buildok/twentyfive.stp
  (*** glibc detected *** stap: double free or corruption (out): 
0x0000000004b6deb0 ***)