[Bug translator/10044] function probes with line numbers are ignoring labels
jistone at redhat dot com
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Tue Apr 7 20:15:00 GMT 2009
------- Additional Comments From jistone at redhat dot com 2009-04-07 20:14 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Note that line numbers are kind of odd for function probes
> in the first place. It's only useful if one doesn't know
> the name of the function at some given source.c:lineno.
It becomes more useful when the lineno is a range. In particular I was trying
to use a range to work around PR10040.
I actually find is strange that we're using .function.label to begin with. It
would make more sense to me to use .statement.label.
Anyway, even odd input does not excuse incorrect output.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10044
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list