Discussion at Linux Foundation Japan Symposium
Jun Koi
junkoi2004@gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 09:28:00 GMT 2008
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:06 PM, jidong xiao <jidong.xiao@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Satoshi OSHIMA
>> <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Long time no see and sorry for my late report.
>>>
>>> I attended 9th Linux Foundation Japan Symposium and
>>> discussed on issues of systemtap project with Ted Ts'o,
>>> James Bottomley and Jonathan Corbet.
>>>
>>> In my understanding, they demand the following things:
>>>
>>> (1) Follow upstream first
>>>
>>> Utrace and uprobe features are currently available only
>>> on Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, since those
>>> patches are not merged into upstream kernel yet.
>>>
>>> my suggestion:
>>>
>>> To reduce complaints of upstream kernel developers,
>>> systemtap project may need to postpone adding new
>>> uprobe features until getting utrace (and uprobe)
>>> patch set accepted in mainline.
>>>
>>>
>>> (2) Maintain tapset
>>>
>>> Systemtap users (including kernel developers) get
>>> frustrated because tapsets often do not work on
>>> the latest kernel. Moreover, sometimes users
>>> have to fix the tapset incompatibility of kernels.
>>>
>>> my suggestion:
>>>
>>> If systemtap procjet can fix this kind of incompatibilities
>>> within a few hours or days as Myths about systemtap
>>> on the wiki claims, releasing new systemtap minor release
>>> tarball for each upstream kernel release would help users.
>>>
>>>
>>> (3) Make no debuginfo version
>>>
>>> Systemtap always requires kernel debuginfo to use.
>>> Unfortunately, it is hard for users of some distributions
>>> to have debuginfo.
>>>
>>
>> How is it possible to do that without kernel debug info? Currently
>> systemtap extracts lots of information on kernel layout from debug
>> info, so I dont understand why we can survive without that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jun
>>
> But not every distribution contains kernel debuginfo packages,
> therefore this makes many people not easy to use systemtap.
>
But my question is: how can we survive without debug info? In that
case, we cannot tap into kernel anymore? (I guess tap on userspace
still works)
Thanks,
Jun
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list