Re: stat.c:248: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of ‘cpumask_next’

[Wenji Huang]

Peter Teoh wrote:
> My systemtap is the latest:
> 
> git describe
> release-0.7-521-g01b05e2
> 
> I have been getting the following errors throughout the whole of last
> week, not sure what is the status:
> 
> In file included from /tmp/stapJzFK4J/stap_7146.c:46:
> /usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stat.c: In function '_stp_stat_get':
> /usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stat.c:213: error: incompatible
> type for argument 2 of 'cpumask_next'
>  _stp_stat_clear
> /usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stat.c: In function '_stp_stat_clear':
> /usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stat.c:248: error: incompatible
> type for argument 2 of 'cpumask_next'
>  task_nsproxy put_nsproxy get_nsproxy ns_cgroup_clone get_uts_ns
> put_uts_ns copy_utsname utsname init_utsname pagefault_disable
> pagefault_enable function__dwarf_tvar_get_size_0 function_exit
> probe_1386 probe_1387 probe_1388 enter_begin_probe enter_end_probe
> enter_error_probe enter_kprobe_probe enter_kretprobe_probe
> enter_hrtimer_probe systemtap_module_init systemtap_module_exit
> probe_start probe_exit
> Execution times (seconds)
>  preprocessing         :   0.20 (34%) usr   0.13 (20%) sys   0.47
> (29%) wall    4956 kB (26%) ggc
>  lexical analysis      :   0.07 (12%) usr   0.32 (50%) sys   0.46
> (29%) wall       0 kB ( 0%) ggc
>  parser                :   0.21 (36%) usr   0.17 (27%) sys   0.59
> (37%) wall   10801 kB (57%) ggc
>  tree gimplify         :   0.08 (14%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.07 (
> 4%) wall    1280 kB ( 7%) ggc
>  symout                :   0.02 ( 3%) usr   0.02 ( 3%) sys   0.01 (
> 1%) wall    1265 kB ( 7%) ggc
>  TOTAL                 :   0.58             0.64             1.61
>         18979 kB
> make[1]: *** [/tmp/stapJzFK4J/stap_7146.o] Error 1
> make: *** [_module_/tmp/stapJzFK4J] Error 2
> Pass 4: compiled C into "stap_7146.ko" in 2490usr/1270sys/7662real ms.
> Pass 4: compilation failed.  Try again with more '-v' (verbose) options.
> 
> 
> 
Sorry for that, the regression is from my commit 
a6ce170764b0ec75d3ddbca20823b2a951a225d2. Already discussed on
  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/systemtap/2008-q4/msg00356.html

If no objection, will adopt srikar's suggestion to use for_each_cpu_mask.

Regards,
Wenji