[Bug translator/6932] c->busy can be removed from kprobe-based handlers

[mhiramat at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From mhiramat at redhat dot com  2008-11-13 00:46 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I would prefer to keep c->busy, since it also functions as a
> reentrancy-prevention mechanism, not just a shutdown-synchronization
> one.

By the way, for reentrancy-prevention, we don't need an atomic-operation,
because the reentrance always occurs on the same processor...

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6932

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.