[Bug translator/6529] error() from nested function can be lost

[joshua dot i dot stone at intel dot com]

------- Additional Comments From joshua dot i dot stone at intel dot com  2008-05-28 18:16 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (with code that computes "outlabel" as per ::visit_statement).

Frank - can you explain the need for the computed outlabels?  I see the comment
about loops in visit_statement, but it doesn't look like anything special is
happening.

I'm thinking about a cleanup that removes most of the "if (last_error)" checks,
and always use unconditional jumps instead.  I think the only last_error checks
needed are after function calls and at the end of probes.  We should also be
able to get rid of this goofy last_error="" business.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |joshua dot i dot stone at
                   |                            |intel dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6529

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.