[patch] Bug #5001 - ctime() vs _stp_ctime() duplication

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 14:01 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I am not sure how I should fix this. Is the idea that the arguments are
> now always referred to by number?

So, the patch makes it work also "dwarfless". If this doesn't show any
regressions on a full make installcheck I'll commit and push it. But I
don't really understand why the previous version worked.  The only thing
I changed in my original patch is how the arguments were used, now how
they were fetched. If anybody has an explanation that would be
appreciated.

Thanks,

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: utime.dwarfless_arguments.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/systemtap/attachments/20080521/d4b812b3/attachment.bin>