my notes from the tracing workshop
Andrew Cagney
cagney@redhat.com
Mon Mar 3 16:57:00 GMT 2008
[sorry missed this e-mail]
William Cohen wrote:
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Visualization.
>>
>> Many visualization tools were presented (if I see another useless
>> full-screen snap-shot in a slide I'll scream), most built on eclipse,
>> but a few were not. While this is a very crowded market, there
>> seems, in mnsho, to still be a need for clear simple visualization
>> tools backed by a databse.
>>
>> The quote of the day, in describing eclipse, has to be "icon diarrhea".
>
> Were the tools showing more than just a simple time line of logs?
> Having just a time-line plot of when things happen is not that useful.
> For example, LTT had some time-line graphing of events. There is
> either too much data or too little data on the screen . When showing a
> signficant portion the time line there is a massive clutter of items
> in the time line in addition to the few events you are interested in.
> When zooming in one only sees the single event, not the other
> interesting event(s). Really want visualization tools declutter and
> filter out as much as possible from the graphics.
>
Yes,
- two tools demonstrated some form of 3d visualization (I know there
were at least two as that each project was doing their own SWT bindings
to OpenGL came up as a topic :-) taking a high level view. For instance
a 3d graph of events vs process over time.
- tptp demonstrated (the 10 minute unintended demo was far more useful
than the slides) zomming in/out using drag select to give that
high-level view and then zoom in
Typically the UI was using SQL queries to extract/filter the data before
visualizing it.
Andrew
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list