Results of systemtap-20071124 snapshot on s390x

[David Wilder]

David Smith wrote:
> David Wilder wrote:
>> David Smith wrote:
>>> David Wilder wrote:
>>>> FAIL: K_MARKER04 compilation failed
>>> I've been meaning to ask about this for awhile, so here goes.  What
>>> kernel is this using (and does this kernel have marker support)?  If
>>> your kernel has markers, this could fail if the first marker found has
>>> no arguments.  If your kernel doesn't have marker support, this test
>>> shouldn't be run.
>>>
>> I forgot to put the kernel version in the test report.  I am running
>> 2.4.24-rc3.  And CONFIG_MARKERS is "y".  I plan to take a look at the
>> failure in the next day or so.  I will let you know what I find.
> 
> Since your kernel does have markers, then I'll bet the first marker that
> the test found doesn't actually have an argument (K_MARKER04 tests
> whether the first argument can be accessed).
> 
> Can you post the K_MARKER04 section of systemtap.log?
> 
> If your problem is that the first marker found doesn't have an argument,
> I'll need to look at changing the test somehow.
> 

Pass 1: parsed user script and 38 library script(s) in 
480usr/0sys/501real ms.^M
Pass 2: analyzed script: 1 probe(s), 1 function(s), 0 embed(s), 0 
global(s) in 20usr/20sys/42real ms.^M
Pass 3: translated to C into 
"/tmp/stapsIbnv3/stap_be214f08543be97af4999459e36b103f_387.c" in 
0usr/0sys/1real ms.^M
Pass 4: compiled C into "stap_be214f08543be97af4999459e36b103f_387.ko" 
in 1170usr/300sys/1485real ms.^M
Pass 4: compilation failed.  Try again with more '-v' (verbose) options.^M
FAIL: K_MARKER04 compilation failed
Pass 1: parsed user script and 38 library script(s) in 
480usr/0sys/499real ms.^M
semantic error: invalid marker argument number: identifier '$arg200' at 
<input>:1:49^M
semantic error: no match for probe point while resolving probe point 
kernel.mark("core_marker_format")^M
Pass 2: analyzed script: 0 probe(s), 0 function(s), 0 embed(s), 0 
global(s) in 20usr/30sys/44real ms.^M
Pass 2: analysis failed.  Try again with more '-v' (verbose) options.^M