Results of systemtap-20070922 snapshot on s390x

[David Wilder]

The examples are not running well on s390 resulting in a number of new 
failures this week.  I have some work ahead of me:)

Kernel 2.6.23-rc6

                 === systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes            410
# of unexpected failures        15
# of expected failures          152
# of unknown successes          1
# of known failures             5
# of untested testcases         26


FAIL: optim
FAIL: backtrace of yyy_func3 (2) (PR 4794)
FAIL: print_stack of yyy_func3 (2) (PR 4794)
FAIL: backtrace of yyy_func4.return (3)
FAIL: print_stack of yyy_func4.return (2)
FAIL: backtrace of timer.profile (1)
FAIL: print_stack of timer.profile (0)
FAIL: systemtap.maps/linear_over.stp (NEW)
FAIL: examples/sig_by_pid.stp   (NEW)
FAIL: examples/sig_by_pid.stp    (NEW)
FAIL: examples/sig_by_proc.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/sig_by_proc.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/sigmon.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/sigmon.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/small_demos/keyhack.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/small_demos/keyhack.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/small_demos/key.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/small_demos/key.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: examples/small_demos/proc_snoop.stp (NEW)
FAIL: examples/small_demos/proc_snoop.stp (NEW)
FAIL: buildok/example.stp  (NEW)
FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp compilation  (PR4902)
FAIL: 64-bit futimes  (PR4902)
FAIL futimes       (PR4902)
FAIL: 64-bit timer  (PR4391)
FAIL timer (PR4391)
FAIL: 64-bit uid16  (NEW)
FAIL: 32-bit futimes (PR4902)
FAIL futimes  (PR4902)
FAIL: 32-bit uid16  (NEW)