[Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs

[fche at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2007-09-20 00:38 -------
> Am I correct in thinking that the pathname must be relative?

Not exactly.  The path name patterns need to match the path names as
seen by the compiler.  A Red Hat kernel build happens to use relative
names, but others may not.  We should try harder to support both, perhaps
with an implicit "**"-equivalent widget at the front of the path name
string.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Document relative vs.       |Support relative and
                   |absolute pathnames in probe |absolute pathnames in probe
                   |PATTERNs                    |PATTERNs


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5049

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.