Using kernel global variables
Frank Ch. Eigler
fche@redhat.com
Mon Aug 6 19:58:00 GMT 2007
Mike Mason <mmlnx@us.ibm.com> writes:
> I believe the variable must be within the *scope* of the probed
> function. The function doesn't necessarily have to use the variable
> for it to be within scope. A global defined in the same file as the
> function is automatically within scope.
Or even *declared* in the same compilation unit - that should work too.
> I don't think exported symbols are within a function's scope from
> SystemTap's perspective [...]
We could change things to search for globals in other compilation
units too - exported ones first, static ones next (with the obvious
risk of name collisions).
- FChE
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list