results of x86_64, i686, and ia64 testing on 20070512 snapshot

Vara Prasad prasadav@us.ibm.com
Wed May 16 02:27:00 GMT 2007


William Cohen wrote:

> Here are the test results from latest snapshot. I have gone through 
> and placed PR number on things that I know. sorry I haven't gotten all 
> of them.

Hi Will,

Thanks for a wonderful job of covering so many OS versions and so many 
platforms.

You are running against 2.6.21 with fedora patches (if any) where as PPC 
tests seems to be running with 2.6.22-rc1 which is straight Linus 
kernel, I don't know what Dave is running on s390.  The only question I 
have is can we at least have one run on an x86 platform with Linus 
kernel so we have apples to apples comparison across all the major 
platforms.

Thanks,
Vara Prasad

>
> -Will
>
> fc7 i686
> Date: 200705152038
> User: wcohen
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1.3142.fc7PAE #1 SMP Mon May 7 21:04:52 EDT 2007 
> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> Testsuite summary of failed tests
> FAIL: systemtap.samples/lket(stap timeout)
> FAIL: conversions.stp 0 (7)
> FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp startup (timeout)
>         === systemtap Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes        318
> # of unexpected failures    3
> # of expected failures        130
> # of unknown successes        2
> # of known failures        5
> # of untested testcases        7
> runtest completed at Tue May 15 18:56:21 2007
>
>
> fc7 x86_64
> ate: 200705142022
> User: wcohen
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1.3142.fc7 #1 SMP Mon May 7 21:07:42 EDT 2007 
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> Testsuite summary of failed tests
> FAIL: systemtap.samples/lket(semantic error)        PR1155
> FAIL: transport fill staging buffer - relayfs (0)
> FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp startup (timeout)
>         === systemtap Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes        340
> # of unexpected failures    3
> # of expected failures        130
> # of unknown successes        1
> # of known failures        6
> # of untested testcases        7
> # of unsupported tests        5
> runtest completed at Mon May 14 17:20:39 2007
>
> rhel4U5 686
> crashed in Need to take a closer look on this one.
>
>
> rhel4U5 x86_64
> Date: 200705142049
> User: wcohen
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> Testsuite summary of failed tests
> FAIL: systemtap.samples/lket(semantic error)        PR4510
> FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp shutdown (eof)   
>         === systemtap Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes        343
> # of unexpected failures    2
> # of expected failures        130
> # of known failures        7
> # of untested testcases        7
> # of unsupported tests        5
> runtest completed at Mon May 14 17:42:21 2007
>
> rhel4U5 ia64
> Date: 200705142051
> User: wcohen
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-55.EL #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:30:19 EDT 2007 ia64 
> ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
>
> Testsuite summary of failed tests
> FAIL: systemtap.base/global_init.stp shutdown (eof) (testsuite problem?)
> FAIL: systemtap.base/kmodule.stp startup (eof)    (elfutil assert 
> failure)
> FAIL: probefunc:kernel.function("context_switch").inline 
> compilation     PR2436
> FAIL: buildok/scsi.stp    (elfutil assert failure)
> FAIL: buildok/syscall.stp
> FAIL: systemtap.samples/lket(pass1)    (elfutil assert failure)
> FAIL: systemtap.samples/tcptest.stp shutdown (eof)    (testsuite 
> problem?)
> FAIL: conversions.stp 0xffffffffffffffff (6)
> FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp startup (eof) (elfutil assert failure)
> FAIL: 64-bit access            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit acct            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit alarm            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit chmod            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit clock            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit dir            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit forkwait            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit itimer            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit link            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit mmap            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit mount            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit net1            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit openclose            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit readwrite            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit rt_signal            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit sendfile            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit stat            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit statfs            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit swap            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit sync            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit timer            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit trunc            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit uid            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit umask            PR4471
> FAIL: 64-bit unlink            PR4471
>         === systemtap Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes        280
> # of unexpected failures    34
> # of unexpected successes    2
> # of expected failures        128
> # of unknown successes        2
> # of known failures        5
> # of untested testcases        7
> # of unsupported tests        3
> runtest completed at Mon May 14 18:17:55 2007
>
>
> rhel5    i686
> Date: 200705142049
> User: wcohen
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Feb 26 20:38:02 EST 2007 
> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> Testsuite summary of failed tests
> FAIL: systemtap.base/kfunct.stp shutdown (eof) (testsuite problem?)
> FAIL: systemtap.base/kmodule.stp shutdown (eof) (no probes fired)
> FAIL: systemtap.samples/lket(semantic error)    PR1155 on 
> nfs_check_flags()
> FAIL: transport fill staging buffer - relayfs (0)
> FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp startup (timeout) (too long to build)
>         === systemtap Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes        315
> # of unexpected failures    5
> # of expected failures        130
> # of unknown successes        1
> # of known failures        6
> # of untested testcases        7
> # of unsupported tests        1
> runtest completed at Mon May 14 17:42:19 2007
>




More information about the Systemtap mailing list