[PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers

[Karim Yaghmour]

Martin Bligh wrote:
> That was always the intent, or codebase + flat patch if really 
> necessary. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Ah, ok.

> Not sure we need scripts, just a normal patch diff would do. I'm not
> sure any of this alters the markup debate much ...

It doesn't, just wasn't clear on the function duplication part.

> it just would seem
> to provide a simpler, faster, and more flexible way of hooking in than
> kprobes.

Sure.

Karim