djprobes status

[Ingo Molnar]

On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 15:24 -0400, Satoshi Oshima wrote:
> We proposed such an idea, but tons of disagreement had come at that
> time;-) If you support the plan, it is worth to try it again.

i like this because it creates synergy between the sw-suspend code and
kprobes. Shared infrastructure is always good. What type of disagreement
was there, was it on lkml?

i dont like the performance aspect of it though: we'd need to schedule
nr_tasks times to insert probes into the kernel. So i'd consider this an
easy "plan B" approach, to be used if "plan A" fails :-)

	Ingo